DBRS Assigns Ratings to Golden Bar (Securitisation) S.r.l. Series 2015-1

DBRS Ratings Limited (DBRS) has today assigned ratings to the notes issued by Golden Bar (Securitisation) S.r.l. Series 2015-1 (the issuer) as follows:

-- Class A Notes: A (sf)
-- Class B Notes: BBB (sf)

The Class A Notes and the Class B Notes are backed by a pool of receivables related to consumer loans of various types granted to retail clients resident in Italy by Santander Consumer Bank S.p.A.
(SCB).

The ratings are based upon review by DBRS of the following analytical considerations:

-- Transaction capital structure, and form and sufficiency of available credit enhancement.
-- Relevant credit enhancement in the form of subordination and a cash reserve.
-- Credit enhancement levels are sufficient to support the expected cumulative net loss assumption projected under various stress scenarios at an A (sf) and BBB (sf) standard for the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes respectively, issued by Golden Bar (Securitisation) S.r.l. Series 2015-1.
-- The ability of the transaction to withstand stressed cash flow assumptions and repay investors according to the terms in which they have invested.
-- SCB’s capabilities with respect to originations, underwriting, servicing and financial strength.
-- The credit quality of the collateral and ability of the servicer to perform collection activities on the collateral. DBRS conducted an operational risk review of Santander Consumer Bank S.p.A. and deems SCB as an acceptable servicer.
-- The legal structure and presence of legal opinions addressing the assignment of the assets to the issuer and the consistency with DBRS’s “Legal Criteria For European Structured Finance Transactions” methodology.

Notes:
All figures are in euros unless otherwise noted.

The principal methodology applicable is: “Rating European Consumer and Commercial Asset-Backed Securitisations.”

DBRS has applied the principal methodology consistently and conducted a review of the transaction in accordance with the principal methodology.

Other methodologies referenced in this transaction are listed at the end of this press release.

This can be found on www.dbrs.com at:
http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies

For a more detailed discussion of sovereign risk impact on Structured Finance ratings, please refer to DBRS’s “The Effect of Sovereign Risk on Securitisations in the Euro Area” commentary on: http://www.dbrs.com/industries/bucket/id/10036/name/commentaries/

The sources of information used for these ratings include performance data relating to the receivables provided by Santander Consumer Bank S.p.A., Santander Consumer Finance S.A., Banco Santander S.A. and Santander UK Plc. DBRS received historical performance data relating to SCB’s originations by quarterly vintage on default and recoveries going back to 2006.

Data was also provided relating to delinquencies, prepayments and initial portfolio stratification tables that allowed DBRS to further assess the collateral.

DBRS does not rely upon third-party due diligence in order to conduct its analysis.

DBRS was supplied with third-party assessments. However, this did not impact the rating analysis.

DBRS considers that the information available to it for the purposes of providing this rating was of satisfactory quality.

DBRS does not audit the information it receives in connection with the rating process, and it does not and cannot independently verify that information in every instance.

This rating concerns a newly issued financial instrument. This is the first DBRS rating on this financial instrument.

The full report providing additional analytical detail is available by clicking on the link or by contacting us at info@dbrs.com.

Information regarding DBRS ratings, including definitions, policies and methodologies are available on www.dbrs.com.

To assess the impact of changing the transaction parameters on the rating, DBRS considered the following stress scenarios, as compared to the parameters used to determine the rating (the Base Case):
-- Probability of Default Rate Used: Base Case PD of 9.05%, a 25% and 50% increase on the base case PD.
-- Recovery Rate Used: Base Case Recovery Rate of 13.25%.
-- Loss Given Default (LGD): Base Case LGD of 50%, a 25% and 50% increase on the base case LGD.

DBRS concludes that for the Class A Notes:
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 25% or a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to BBB (high) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 50% or a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to BBB (low) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 25% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to BB (high) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 50% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to BB (low) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 25% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to BB (low) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 50% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes below B (sf).

DBRS concludes that for the Class B Notes:
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 25% or a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to BB (high) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 50% or a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to B (high) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 25% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to B (high) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 50% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes below B (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 25% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes below B (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 50% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes below B (sf).

For further information on DBRS historic default rates published by the European Securities and Markets Administration (ESMA) in a central repository, see:
http://cerep.esma.europa.eu/cerep-web/statistics/defaults.xhtml.
Ratings assigned by DBRS Ratings Limited are subject to EU regulations only.

Initial Lead Analyst: Eric Levassor
Initial Rating Date: 9 October 2015
Initial Rating Committee Chair: Chuck Weilamann

Last Rating Date: Not applicable; no last rating date.

Lead Surveillance Analyst: Vito Natale
Rating Committee Chair: Chuck Weilamann

DBRS Ratings Limited
1 Minster Court, 10th Floor
Mincing Lane
London
EC3R 7AA
United Kingdom

Registered in England and Wales: No. 7139960

The rating methodologies and criteria used in the analysis of this transaction can be found at: http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies.

-- Rating European Consumer and Commercial Asset-Backed Securitisations.
-- Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions.
-- Operational Risk Assessment for European Structured Finance Servicers.
-- Unified Interest Rate Model Methodology for European Securitisations.

A description of how DBRS analyses structured finance transactions and how the methodologies are collectively applied can be found at: http://www.dbrs.com/research/278375.