DBRS Upgrades Ratings on Florence SPV S.r.l.

DBRS Ratings Limited (DBRS) has today upgraded ratings on the notes issued by Florence SPV S.r.l. (Florence SPV, the Issuer or the SPV) as follows:

-- Class A Notes: AA (sf)
-- Class B Notes: A (sf)

The ratings are based upon review by DBRS of the following analytical considerations:
-- Transaction capital structure, and form and sufficiency of available credit enhancement.
-- Relevant credit enhancement in the form of subordination and a cash reserve.
-- Credit enhancement levels are sufficient to support the expected cumulative net loss assumption projected under various stress scenarios at AA (sf) for the Class A Notes and at A (sf) for the Class B Notes issued by Florence SPV.
-- The ability of the transaction to withstand stressed cash flow assumptions and repay investors according to the terms in which they have been invested.
-- The credit quality of the collateral and ability of the servicer to perform collection activities on the collateral. DBRS conducted an operational risk review of Findomestic S.p.A (Findomestic) and deems Findomestic to be an acceptable servicer.
-- Findomestic’s capabilities with respect to originations, underwriting, servicing and financial strength.
-- The legal structure and presence of legal opinions addressing the assignment of the assets to the issuer and the consistency with DBRS’s “Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions” methodology.

The transaction was modelled in Intex Dealmaker and the default rates at which the rated notes did not return all specified cash flows in a timely manner were determined.

Notes:
All figures are in euros unless otherwise noted. The principal methodology applicable is: “Rating European Consumer and Commercial Asset-Backed Securitisations.”

-- DBRS has applied the principal methodology consistently and conducted a review of the transaction in accordance with the principal methodology.

Other methodologies referenced in this transaction are listed at the end of this press release. This may be found on www.dbrs.com at: http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies

For a more detailed discussion of the sovereign risk impact on Structured Finance ratings, please refer to DBRS’s “The Effect of Sovereign Risk on Securitisations in the Euro Area” commentary on: http://www.dbrs.com/industries/bucket/id/10036/name/commentaries/

The sources of information used for these ratings include performance and portfolio data relating to the receivables sourced by Findomestic. DBRS received historical gross loss data and historical recovery data from 2006 to 2015 and dynamic prepayment and delinquency data. In addition, DBRS received a loan-by-loan analysis of the portfolio as well as stratification tables related to the portfolio as at October 2015.

DBRS does not rely upon third-party due diligence in order to conduct its analysis.

-- DBRS was supplied with third-party assessments.

Data checks were performed and DBRS did not apply additional cash flow stresses in its scenarios. DBRS considers the information available to it for the purposes of providing this rating was of satisfactory quality.

DBRS does not audit the information it receives in connection with the rating process, and it does not and cannot independently verify that information in every instance.

The last rating action on this transaction took place on 25 June 2015 when the rating of AA (low) (sf) and A (low) (sf) was confirmed on the Class A and B Notes respectively.

Information regarding DBRS ratings, including definitions, policies and methodologies are available on www.dbrs.com.

To assess the impact of changing the transaction parameters on the rating, DBRS considered the following stress scenarios, as compared to the parameters used to determine the rating (the Base Case):

-- Probability of Default Rate Used: Base Case PD of 12.08%, a 25% and 50% increase on the base case PD.
-- Recovery Rate Used: Base Case Recovery Rate of 10.58%.
-- Loss Given Default (LGD): Base Case LGD of 89.42%, a 25% and 50% increase on the base case LGD.

DBRS concludes that for the Class A Notes:
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 25% would lead to a downgrade of the rating of the Class A Notes to A (high) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 50% would lead to a downgrade of the rating of the Class A Notes to A (low) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case LGD by 25% would lead to a downgrade of the rating of the Class A Notes to AA (low) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case LGD by 50% would lead to a downgrade of the rating of the Class A Notes to AA (low) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 25% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the rating of the Class A Notes to A (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 50% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to BBB (high) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 25% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to A (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 50% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to BBB (high) (sf).

DBRS concludes that for the Class B Notes:
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 25% would lead to a downgrade of the rating of the Class B Notes to A (low) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 50% would lead to a downgrade of the rating of the Class B Notes to BBB (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case LGD by 25% would lead to maintain the rating of the Class B Notes at A (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case LGD by 50% would lead to maintain the rating of the Class B Notes at A (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 25% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the rating of the Class B Notes to BBB (high) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 50% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to BBB (low) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 25% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to BBB (high) (sf).
-- A hypothetical increase of the base case PD by 50% and a hypothetical increase of the LGD by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to BBB (low) (sf).

For further information on DBRS historic default rates published by the European Securities and Markets Administration (ESMA) in a central repository, see: http://cerep.esma.europa.eu/cerep-web/statistics/defaults.xhtml.

Ratings assigned by DBRS Ratings Limited are subject to EU regulations only.

Initial Lead Analyst: Alessio Pignataro
Initial Rating Date: 2 December 2015
Initial Rating Committee Chair: Jamie Feehely

Lead Surveillance Analyst: Vito Natale
Rating Committee Chair: Jamie Feehely

DBRS Ratings Limited
1 Minster Court, 10th Floor Mincing Lane, London EC3R 7AA
United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales: No. 7139960

The rating methodologies used in the analysis of this transaction can be found at: http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies

Rating European Consumer and Commercial Asset-Backed Securitisations
Operational Risk Assessment for European Structured Finance Servicers
Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions.

A description of how DBRS analyses structured finance transactions and how the methodologies are collectively applied can be found at: http://www.dbrs.com/research/278375