DBRS Confirms Ratings on the Notes Issued by IM EVO RMBS 1 FT

DBRS Ratings Limited (DBRS) has today confirmed the ratings on the following Notes issued by IM EVO RMBS 1 FT (the Issuer):

-- Series A Notes at A (high) (sf)
-- Series B Notes at BBB (high) (sf)

The confirmation of the ratings on the Series A and B Notes reflects an annual review of the transaction and is based on the following analytical considerations:
-- Portfolio performance in terms of delinquencies and defaults as of the April 2017 payment date.
-- Probability of default (PD) rate, loss given default (LGD) rate and expected loss assumptions for the remaining portfolio collateral.
-- Current available credit enhancement to the Series A and B Notes to cover the expected losses at the A (high) (sf) and BBB (high) (sf) rating levels, respectively.

IM EVO RMBS 1 FT is a securitisation of Spanish prime residential mortgage loans originated by Nova Caixa Galicia (NCG, now Abanca Corporación Bancaria S.A.) and EVO Banco S.A.U. (EVO) and serviced by EVO. The transaction follows Spanish Securitisation Law and closed in July 2015.

PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE
The performance of the collateral portfolio is within DBRS’s expectations. As of April 2017, there are no loans more than 90 days in arrears, and since closing, the 90+ delinquency ratio has averaged 0.02% of the outstanding performing portfolio collateral balance. Defaults are defined as loans in arrears for more than 12 months; to date, there are no observed defaulted loans.

PORTFOLIO ASSUMPTIONS
DBRS conducted a loan-by-loan analysis on the remaining pool and updated its PD and LGD assumptions on the remaining portfolio collateral pool to 18.48% and 34.48% at the A (high) (sf) rating level and to 14.03% and 27.26% at the BBB (high) (sf) rating level, respectively.

CREDIT ENHANCEMENT
The Series A Notes are supported by the subordination of the Series B Notes and the Reserve Fund, which provides liquidity support and credit support to the Series A and B Notes. As of the April 2017 payment date, credit enhancement for the Series A and B Notes was at 15.80% and 8.61% of the outstanding performing portfolio collateral balance, respectively.

Banco Santander SA acts as the Account Bank (as holder of the Treasury Account) for this transaction. The Account Bank reference rating of “A,” which is one notch below the DBRS Long-Term Critical Obligations Rating (COR) of Banco Santander SA at A (high), complies with the Minimum Institution Rating, given the rating assigned to the Series A Notes, as described in DBRS’s “Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions” methodology.

Notes:
All figures are in euros unless otherwise noted.

The principal methodology applicable to the ratings is: “Master European Structured Finance Surveillance Methodology.”

DBRS has applied the principal methodology consistently and conducted a review of the transactions in accordance with the principal methodology.

A review of the transaction legal documents was not conducted as the legal documents have remained unchanged since the most recent rating action.

Other methodologies referenced in this transaction are listed at the end of this press release.

These may be found on www.dbrs.com at: http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies.

For a more detailed discussion of the sovereign risk impact on Structured Finance ratings, please refer to DBRS commentary “The Effect of Sovereign Risk on Securitisations in the Euro Area” on: http://www.dbrs.com/industries/bucket/id/10036/name/commentaries/.

The sources of data and information used for these ratings include the investor reports provided by InterMoney Titulización S.G.F.T., S.A and the loan-by-loan data from the European Data Warehouse GmbH.

DBRS did not rely upon third-party due diligence in order to conduct its analysis.

At the time of the initial rating DBRS was supplied with third-party assessments. However, this did not impact the rating analysis.

DBRS considers the data and information available to it for the purposes of providing these ratings to be of satisfactory quality.

DBRS does not audit or independently verify the data or information it receives in connection with the rating process.

The last rating action on this transaction took place on 2 June 2016, when DBRS upgraded the ratings on the Series A Notes to A (high) (sf) from A (sf) and the Series B Notes to BBB (high) (sf) from BBB (sf).

The lead analyst responsibilities for this transaction have been transferred to Antonio Di Marco.

Information regarding DBRS ratings, including definitions, policies and methodologies, is available on www.dbrs.com.

To assess the impact of changing the transactions parameters on the ratings, DBRS considered the following stress scenarios, as compared to the parameters used to determine the ratings (the Base Case):

-- DBRS expected a lifetime Base Case PD and LGD for the pool based on a review of the current assets. Adverse changes to asset performance may cause stresses to Base Case assumptions and therefore have a negative effect on credit ratings.

-- The Base Case PD and LGD of the pool of mortgages are 5.63% and 20.92%, respectively. At the A (high) (sf) rating level, the corresponding PD is 18.48% and the LGD is 34.48%.

-- The Risk Sensitivity overview below illustrates the ratings expected if the PD and LGD increase by a certain percentage over the Base Case assumption. For example, if the LGD increases by 50%, the rating on the Series A Notes would be expected to be A (high) (sf), assuming no change in the PD. If the PD increases by 50%, the rating on the Series A Notes would be expected to be A (high) (sf), assuming no change in the LGD. Furthermore, if both the PD and LGD increase by 50%, the rating on the Series A Notes would be expected to be A (low) (sf).

Series A Notes Sensitivity:
-- 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of A (high) (sf)
-- 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of A (high) (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD, expected rating of A (high) (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD, expected rating of A (high) (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD and 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of A (high) (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD and 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of A (high) (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD and 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of A (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD and 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of A (low) (sf)

Series B Notes Sensitivity:
-- 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of BBB (high) (sf)
-- 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of BBB (high) (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD, expected rating of BBB (high) (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD, expected rating of BBB (low) (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD and 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of BBB (low) (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD and 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of BB (high) (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD and 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of BB (high) (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD and 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of BB (high) (sf)

For further information on DBRS historical default rates published by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) in a central repository, see: http://cerep.esma.europa.eu/cerep-web/statistics/defaults.xhtml.

Ratings assigned by DBRS Ratings Limited are subject to EU regulations only.

Lead Analyst: Antonio Di Marco, Senior Financial Analyst
Rating Committee Chair: Christian Aufsatz, Managing Director
Initial Rating Date: 16 July 2015

DBRS Ratings Limited
20 Fenchurch Street, 31st Floor, London EC3M 3BY
United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales: No. 7139960

The rating methodologies used in the analysis of these transactions can be found at: http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies.

-- Master European Structured Finance Surveillance Methodology
-- European RMBS Insight: Spanish Addendum
-- Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions
-- Operational Risk Assessment for European Structured Finance Servicers
-- Unified Interest Rate Model for European Securitisations

A description of how DBRS analyses structured finance transactions and how the methodologies are collectively applied can be found at: http://www.dbrs.com/research/278375.