DBRS Confirms Ratings on Cars Alliance Auto Loans Germany V 2016-1

DBRS Ratings GmbH (DBRS) confirmed its AAA (sf) ratings on the Class A Notes and Class B Notes (the Rated Notes) issued by Cars Alliance Auto Loans Germany V 2016-1 (the Issuer).

The confirmations follow an annual review of the transaction and are based on the following analytical considerations:
-- The overall portfolio performance as of the April 2019 payment date, particularly with regard to low levels of delinquencies and cumulative net losses;
-- Updated default rate and expected loss assumptions for the remaining collateral pool;
-- The current available credit enhancement (CE) to the the Rated Notes to cover the expected losses assumed in line with their AAA (sf) rating level.

The ratings address the timely payment of interest and ultimate payment of principal payable on or before the final maturity date in May 2027.

The Issuer is a securitisation collateralised by a portfolio of auto loan receivables granted by RCI Banque S.A. Niederlassung Deutschland (RCI Germany), the German branch of RCI Group and Renault S.A.S. captive lender. The transaction closed in May 2016 and had a one-year revolving period.

As at 18 April 2019, the balance of the Class A was EUR 265.0 million, the balance of the Class B was EUR 22.8 million and the balance of the Class C was 38.1 million. The EUR 325.6 million portfolio (excluding defaulted receivables) includes loans granted to finance the purchase of new (91.3%) and used (8.7%) vehicles.

PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE
As at the April 2019 payment date, loans that were one- to -two months and two- to three-months delinquent represented 0.6% and 0.3% of the portfolio net discounted balance, respectively, while delinquencies greater than three months were 0.1%. Gross cumulative defaults were 0.7% of the original portfolio and cumulative transferred receivables, with cumulative recoveries of 67.7%.

PORTFOLIO ASSUMPTIONS
DBRS conducted an updated loan-by-loan analysis. As a result, DBRS has kept its expected default assumption at 1.5% and updated its base case recovery rate to 66.0%; for the AAA (sf) rating level, DBRS assumed a probability of default (PD) of 7.3% and a recovery rate of 44.2%. The base case assumptions were further adjusted to address the risks associated with set-off and credit insurance.

CREDIT ENHANCEMENT
CE for the Rated Notes is provided by the subordination of the respective junior obligations and the general reserve account. As of the April 2019 payment date, the Class A Notes’ CE was 19.7% and the Class B Notes’ CE was 12.7%.

The transaction structure includes an amortising general reserve account, which is available to cover senior expenses and missed interest payments on the Rated Notes. This account is currently funded at its floor of EUR 3.6 million.

The structure also includes a commingling reserve account and a set-off reserve account, which will be funded if certain triggers are breached. To date, these reserves continue to be unfunded.

Société Générale, S.A. (SocGen) acts as the account bank for the transaction. Based on the reference rating of SocGen at AA (low), which is one notch below DBRS’s Long-Term Critical Obligations Rating of AA, the downgrade provisions outlined in the transaction documents, and structural mitigants, DBRS considers the risk arising from the exposure to SocGen to be consistent with the ratings assigned to the Rated Notes, as described in DBRS's "Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions" methodology

The Issuer entered into two swap agreements with RCI Germany to hedge the interest rate mismatch between the Rated Notes, indexed to one-month Euribor, and the fixed interest rate payments from the securitised portfolio. The Issuer’s stand-by swap counterparty, Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (CACIB), guarantees the financial and operational terms of the swap agreements. If RCI Germany fails to meet its obligations as swap counterparty, CACIB will step in to hedge the Issuer’s exposure. The stand-by swap agreement defines downgrade provisions in line with DBRS’s “Derivative Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions” methodology.

The transaction structure was analysed with Intex DealMaker.

Notes:
All figures are in euros unless otherwise noted.

The principal methodology applicable to the ratings is: “Master European Structured Finance Surveillance Methodology”.

DBRS has applied the principal methodology consistently and conducted a review of the transactions in accordance with the principal methodology.

A review of the transaction’s legal documents was not conducted as the legal documents have remained unchanged since the most recent rating actions.

Other methodologies referenced in this transaction are listed at the end of this press release.

These may be found on www.dbrs.com at: http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies.

For a more detailed discussion of the sovereign risk impact on Structured Finance ratings, please refer to “Appendix C: The Impact of Sovereign Ratings on Other DBRS Credit Ratings” of the “Rating Sovereign Governments” methodology at: https://www.dbrs.com/research/333487/rating-sovereign-governments.

The sources of data and information used for these ratings include investor reports provided by Eurotitrisation (the Management Company).

DBRS did not rely upon third-party due diligence in order to conduct its analysis.

At the time of the initial ratings, DBRS was supplied with third-party assessments. However, this did not impact the rating analysis.

DBRS considers the data and information available to it for the purposes of providing these ratings to be of satisfactory quality.

DBRS does not audit or independently verify the data or information it receives in connection with the rating process.

The last rating action on this transaction took place on 3 May 2018, when DBRS confirmed its rating on the Class A Notes at AAA (sf) and upgraded its rating on the Class B Notes to AAA (sf) from AA (sf).

The lead analyst responsibilities for this transaction have been transferred to Alfonso Candelas.

Information regarding DBRS ratings, including definitions, policies and methodologies, is available on www.dbrs.com.

To assess the impact of changing the transaction parameters on the ratings, DBRS considered the following stress scenarios, as compared to the parameters used to determine the rating (the Base Case):

-- DBRS expected a base case PD and LGD for the portfolio based on a review of the current assets. Adverse changes to asset performance may cause stresses to base case assumptions and, therefore, have a negative effect on credit ratings.
-- The base case PD and LGD of the current pool of receivables are 1.5% and 34.0%, respectively. At the AAA (sf) rating level, the corresponding PD is 7.3% and the LGD 55.8%.
-- The risk sensitivity below illustrates the ratings expected for the Rated Notes if the PD and LGD increase by a certain percentage over the base case assumptions. For example, if the LGD increases by 50%, the rating on the Rated Notes would be expected to remain at AAA (sf), all else being equal. If the PD increases by 50%, the rating on the Rated Notes would be expected to remain at AAA (sf), all else being equal. Furthermore, if both the PD and LGD increase by 50%, the rating on the Rated Notes would be expected to remain at AAA (sf).

Class A Notes Risk Sensitivity:
-- 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD and 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD and 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD and 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD and 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of AAA (sf)

Class B Notes Risk Sensitivity:
-- 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD and 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD and 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD and 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of AAA (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD and 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of AAA (sf)

For further information on DBRS historical default rates published by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) in a central repository, see: http://cerep.esma.europa.eu/cerep-web/statistics/defaults.xhtml.

Ratings assigned by DBRS Ratings GmbH are subject to EU and US regulations only.

Lead Analyst: Alfonso Candelas, Senior Vice President
Rating Committee Chair: Christian Aufsatz, Managing Director
Initial Rating Date: 21 April 2016

DBRS Ratings GmbH
Neue Mainzer Straße 75
60311 Frankfurt am Main Deutschland

Geschäftsführer: Detlef Scholz
Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main, HRB 110259

The rating methodologies used in the analysis of this transaction can be found at: http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies.

-- Master European Structured Finance Surveillance Methodology
-- Rating European Consumer and Commercial Asset-Backed Securitisations
-- Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions
-- Derivative Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions
-- Interest Rate Stresses for European Structured Finance Transactions
-- Operational Risk Assessment for European Structured Finance Servicers

A description of how DBRS analyses structured finance transactions and how the methodologies are collectively applied can be found at: http://www.dbrs.com/research/278375.

For more information on this credit or on this industry, visit www.dbrs.com or contact us at info@dbrs.com.