DBRS Confirms Rating on Castilho Mortgages No.1

DBRS Ratings Limited (DBRS) has today confirmed the rating of A (high) (sf) on the Class A notes issued by Castilho Mortgages No.1 (the Issuer).

The confirmation of the rating on the Class A notes is based on the following analytical considerations, as described more fully below:
-- Portfolio performance, in terms of delinquencies and defaults, as of the July 2016 payment date.
-- Updated portfolio default rate, loss given default and expected loss assumptions for the remaining collateral pool.
-- Current available credit enhancement to the Class A notes to cover the expected losses at the A (high) (sf) rating level.

Castilho Mortgages No.1 is a securitisation of Portuguese prime residential mortgages originated and serviced by Deutsche Bank AG, Portugal. The transaction follows the standard structure under Portuguese securitisation law and closed in September 2013.

The transaction has a three-year revolving period, scheduled to terminate in October 2016.

As of July 2016, 31-60 day arrears are at 0.16%, down from 0.35% in July 2015. 90+ day arrears are currently 0.16%, down from 0.20% in July 2015. The current cumulative default ratio is low at 0.44%.

As of July 2016, credit enhancement to the Class A notes was 18.74%. Credit enhancement to the Class A notes consists of subordination of the Class B notes and a Cash Reserve.

The transaction benefits from a Cash Reserve that is available to cover senior fees, interest shortfall and principal shortfall (via the PDL) on the Class A notes. The Cash Reserve is currently at the target level of EUR 39.98 million and is permitted to amortise under certain conditions, subject to an absolute floor of EUR 13.3 million.

Deutsche Bank AG, Portugal is the Account Bank for the transaction. The DBRS private rating of Deutsche Bank AG, Portugal complies with the Minimum Institution Rating given the rating assigned to the Class A notes, as described in DBRS’s “Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance Transaction” methodology.

Notes:
All figures are in euros unless otherwise noted.

The principal methodology applicable is the Master European Structured Finance Surveillance Methodology.

DBRS has applied the principal methodology consistently and conducted a review of the transaction in accordance with the principal methodology.

An asset and a cash flow analysis were both conducted. However, due to the inclusion of a revolving period in the transaction and no change in assumptions, the initial analysis based on the worst-case replenishment criteria set forth in the transaction legal documents was assumed.

A review of the transaction legal documents was not conducted as the documents have remained unchanged since the most recent rating action.

Other methodologies referenced in this transaction are listed at the end of this press release.

These may be found on www.dbrs.com at http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies.

For a more detailed discussion of the sovereign risk impact on Structured Finance ratings, please refer to DBRS commentary “The Effect of Sovereign Risk on Securitisations in the Euro Area” on: http://www.dbrs.com/industries/bucket/id/10036/name/commentaries/.

The sources of information used for this rating include cash management reports provided by Deutsche Bank AG, Portugal (the “Transaction Manager”) and data from the European DataWarehouse GmbH.

DBRS does not rely upon third-party due diligence in order to conduct its analysis.

DBRS was not supplied with third party assessments. However, this did not impact the rating analysis.

DBRS considers the information available to it for the purposes of providing this rating to be of satisfactory quality.

DBRS does not audit the information it receives in connection with the rating process, and it does not and cannot independently verify that information in every instance.

The last rating action on this transaction took place on 18 September 2015, when DBRS confirmed the rating on the Class A notes at A (high) (sf).

Information regarding DBRS ratings, including definitions, policies and methodologies, is available on www.dbrs.com

To assess the impact of changing the transaction parameters on the rating, DBRS considered the following stress scenarios, as compared with the parameters used to determine the rating (the base case):
-- DBRS expected a lifetime base case probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) for the pool based on a review of the current assets. Adverse changes to asset performance may cause stresses to base case assumptions and therefore have a negative effect on credit ratings.
-- The base case PD and LGD of the current pool of mortgages for the Issuer are 12.31% and 27.41%, respectively. At the A (high) (sf) rating level, the corresponding PD is 31.10% and the LGD is 39.51%.
-- The Risk Sensitivity overview below illustrates the ratings expected if the PD and LGD increase by a certain percentage over the base case assumption. For example, if the LGD increases by 50%, the rating of the Class A notes would be expected to fall to A (low) (sf), assuming no change in the PD. If the PD increases by 50%, the rating for the Class A notes would be expected to fall to BBB (high) (sf), assuming no change in the LGD. Furthermore, if both the PD and LGD increase by 50%, the rating of the Class A notes would be expected to fall to BB (high) (sf).

Class A notes Risk Sensitivity:
-- 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of A (high) (sf)
-- 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of A (low) (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD, expected rating of A (high) (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD, expected rating of BBB (high) (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD and 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of BBB (high) (sf)
-- 25% increase in PD and 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of BBB (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD and 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of BBB (sf)
-- 50% increase in PD and 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of BB (high) (sf)

For further information on DBRS historical default rates published by the European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) in a central repository, see: http://cerep.esma.europa.eu/cerep-web/statistics/defaults.xhtml.

Ratings assigned by DBRS Ratings Limited are subject to EU regulations only.

Initial Lead Analyst: Alastair Bigley
Initial Rating Date: 26 September 2013
Initial Rating Committee Chair: Claire Mezzanotte

Lead Surveillance Analyst: Andrew Lynch, Senior Financial Analyst
Rating Committee Chair: Christian Aufsatz, Senior Vice President

DBRS Ratings Limited
20 Fenchurch Street
31st Floor
London
EC3M 3BY
United Kingdom

Registered in England and Wales: No. 7139960.

The rating methodologies and criteria used in the analysis of this transaction can be found at http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies.

-- Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance
-- Master European Structured Finance Surveillance Methodology
-- Operational Risk Assessment for European Structured Finance Servicers
-- Operational Risk Assessment for European Structured Finance Originators
-- Master European Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Rating Methodology and Jurisdictional Addenda
-- Unified Interest Rate Model for European Securitisations

A description of how DBRS analyses structured finance transactions and how the methodologies are collectively applied can be found at http://www.dbrs.com/research/278375.