Press Release

DBRS Confirms the Ratings on IBL CQS 2013 S.r.l.

Consumer Loans & Credit Cards
August 01, 2014

DBRS Ratings Limited (“DBRS”) has confirmed the following ratings on the Notes issued by IBL CQS 2013 S.r.l. (“the Issuer”):
• Class A Notes confirmed at A (low) (sf), and
• Class B Notes confirmed at BBB (sf).

The confirmation follows amendments to the legal documentation executed on 30 July 2014. The amendments result in the change of the definition of Cash Reserve Target Amount. DBRS has taken into consideration the reduction of the Cash Reserve in its analysis.

Notes:
All figures are in Euro unless otherwise noted.
The principal methodology applicable is the Master European Structured Finance Surveillance Methodology. Other methodologies and criteria referenced in this transaction are listed at the end of this press release.

This can be found on www.dbrs.com at:
http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies

For a more detailed discussion of sovereign risk impact on Structured Finance ratings, please refer to DBRS commentary “The Effect of Sovereign Risk on Securitisations in the Euro Area” on: http://www.dbrs.com/industries/bucket/id/10036/name/commentaries/.

The sources of information used for this rating include payment reports and investor reports provided by Zenith Service S.p.A. DBRS considers the information available to it for the purposes of providing this rating was of satisfactory quality.

DBRS does not audit the information it receives in connection with the rating process, and it does not and cannot independently verify that information in every instance.

The last rating action on this transaction took place on 20 December 2013, when DBRS assigned the rating of A (low) to the Class A Notes and the rating of BBB (sf) to the Class B Notes.

Information regarding DBRS ratings, including definitions, policies and methodologies are available on www.dbrs.com.

To assess the impact of the changing the transaction parameters on the rating, DBRS considered the following stress scenarios, as compared to the parameters used to determine the rating (the “Base Case”):
• DBRS expected a Base Case Probability of Default (PD) and Loss Given Default (LGD) for the pool based on a review of the transaction performance. Adverse changes to asset performance may cause stresses to base case assumptions and therefore have a negative effect on credit ratings.
• The Base Case PD and LGD of the current pool of receivables are 7.32% and 47.09%, respectively.
• The Risk Sensitivity overview below illustrates the ratings expected for the Class A Notes if the PD and LGD increase by a certain percentage over the Base Case assumption. For example, if the LGD increase by 50% the rating for the Class A Notes would be expected to be A (low) (sf), all else being equal. If the PD increases by 50% the rating for the Class A Notes would be expected to be A (low) (sf), all else being equal. If both the LGD and PD increase by 50%, the rating of the Class A Notes would be expected to be lowered to BB (high) (sf), all else being equal.

Class A Notes Risk Sensitivity:

  • 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of A (low) (sf).
  • 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of A (low) (sf).
  • 25% increase in PD, expected rating of A (low) (sf).
  • 50% increase in PD, expected rating of A (low) (sf).
  • 25% increase in LGD and 25% increase in PD, expected rating of A (low) (sf).
  • 25% increase in LGD and 50% increase in PD, expected rating of BBB (sf).
  • 50% increase in LGD and 25% increase in PD, expected rating of BBB (sf).
  • 50% increase in LGD and 50% increase in PD, expected rating of BB (high) (sf).

Class B Notes Risk Sensitivity:

  • 25% increase in LGD, expected rating of BB (sf).
  • 50% increase in LGD, expected rating of B (high) (sf).
  • 25% increase in PD, expected rating of BB (sf).
  • 50% increase in PD, expected rating of B (high) (sf).
  • 25% increase in LGD and 25% increase in PD, expected rating of B (sf).
  • 25% increase in LGD and 50% increase in PD, expected rating of CCC (sf).
  • 50% increase in LGD and 25% increase in PD, expected rating of CCC (sf).
  • 50% increase in LGD and 50% increase in PD, expected rating of CCC (sf).

For further information on DBRS historic default rates published by the European Securities and Markets Administration (“ESMA”) in a central repository, see:
http://cerep.esma.europa.eu/cerep-web/statistics/defaults.xhtml.

Ratings assigned by DBRS Ratings Limited are subject to EU regulations only.

Initial Lead Analyst: Paolo Conti
Initial Rating Date: 20 December 2013
Initial Rating Committee Chair: Chuck Weilamann

Lead Surveillance Analyst: Elisa Scalco
Rating Committee Chair: Chuck Weilamann

DBRS Ratings Limited
1 Minster Court, 10th Floor
Mincing Lane
London
EC3R 7AA
United Kingdom

Registered in England and Wales: No. 7139960

The rating methodologies and criteria used in the analysis of this transaction can be found at: http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies

• Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions.
• Master European Structured Finance Surveillance Methodology.
• Operational Risk Assessment for European Structured Finance Servicers.
• Unified Interest Rate Model for European Securitisations.
• Rating European Consumer and Commercial Asset-Backed Securitisations.

Ratings

  • US = Lead Analyst based in USA
  • CA = Lead Analyst based in Canada
  • EU = Lead Analyst based in EU
  • UK = Lead Analyst based in UK
  • E = EU endorsed
  • U = UK endorsed
  • Unsolicited Participating With Access
  • Unsolicited Participating Without Access
  • Unsolicited Non-participating

ALL MORNINGSTAR DBRS RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO DISCLAIMERS AND CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. PLEASE READ THESE DISCLAIMERS AND LIMITATIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING MORNINGSTAR DBRS RATINGS, INCLUDING DEFINITIONS, POLICIES, RATING SCALES AND METHODOLOGIES.